Difference between revisions of "Develop paper outline"

From Organic Data Science Framework
Jump to: navigation, search
(Added PropertyValue: Participants = Felix Michel)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
[[Category:Task]]
 
[[Category:Task]]
 +
 +
Draft outline:
 +
 +
# Introduction: talk about collaborative science
 +
## social science studies of collaboration in large science projects
 +
## sharing in science:
 +
### through data services
 +
### through resource sharing (e.g. Open Science Grid)
 +
### through instruments (e.g. LHC)
 +
## Our goal is to support organic collaboration, i.e., ad-hoc unanticipated collaboration
 +
# Motivating scenario: describe in the context of a specific science project why scientists need better ways to collaborate and coordinate work in order to do research
 +
## why do we need this new framework in order to do the science of predicting pathways and age of water and carbon isotopes for lake-catchment systems
 +
## Requirements that result from those scenarios
 +
### cannot anticipate who has expertise for what we need
 +
### need asynchronous participation
 +
### need low barrier for entry
 +
# Approach: a task-centered collaboration framework that makes science processes open and is based on social design principles
 +
## Social computing principles that address those requirements
 +
## Task-centered framework
 +
# Evaluation
 +
## discuss possible methods to use, our choice of methods. See [[Design_user_evaluation_of_initial_framework_design | this page]]
 +
## results
 +
## discuss results
 +
# Conclusions and future work
 +
 
<!-- Add any wiki Text above this Line -->
 
<!-- Add any wiki Text above this Line -->
 
<!-- Do NOT Edit below this Line -->
 
<!-- Do NOT Edit below this Line -->

Revision as of 18:02, 12 September 2014


Draft outline:

  1. Introduction: talk about collaborative science
    1. social science studies of collaboration in large science projects
    2. sharing in science:
      1. through data services
      2. through resource sharing (e.g. Open Science Grid)
      3. through instruments (e.g. LHC)
    3. Our goal is to support organic collaboration, i.e., ad-hoc unanticipated collaboration
  2. Motivating scenario: describe in the context of a specific science project why scientists need better ways to collaborate and coordinate work in order to do research
    1. why do we need this new framework in order to do the science of predicting pathways and age of water and carbon isotopes for lake-catchment systems
    2. Requirements that result from those scenarios
      1. cannot anticipate who has expertise for what we need
      2. need asynchronous participation
      3. need low barrier for entry
  3. Approach: a task-centered collaboration framework that makes science processes open and is based on social design principles
    1. Social computing principles that address those requirements
    2. Task-centered framework
  4. Evaluation
    1. discuss possible methods to use, our choice of methods. See this page
    2. results
    3. discuss results
  5. Conclusions and future work


Yandex.Metrica