Difference between revisions of "Discuss what we will consider a GPF"
From Geoscience Paper of the Future
(→The Case of the Tuberculosis Drugome) |
|||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
* [http://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000976 the original "drugome" paper] | * [http://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000976 the original "drugome" paper] | ||
| − | * [http://www.wings-workflows.org/drugome/the web site that describes how that paper was reproduced] | + | * [http://www.wings-workflows.org/drugome/ the web site that describes how that paper was reproduced] |
* [http://www.wings-workflows.org/drugome/index.php/Main_Page#Augmenting_the_original_article detailed documentation of the drugome method] | * [http://www.wings-workflows.org/drugome/index.php/Main_Page#Augmenting_the_original_article detailed documentation of the drugome method] | ||
* [http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0080278 a publication that reports on that work]. | * [http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0080278 a publication that reports on that work]. | ||
Revision as of 22:14, 6 February 2015
Executable Papers
Elsevier carried out an [ Executable Papers Challenge].
The Case of the Tuberculosis Drugome
This is a case where the workflow was made explicit and published as linked open data in RDF (i.e., accessible Web objects in the Semantic Web). The data were assigned DOIs, as was the workflow.
- the original "drugome" paper
- the web site that describes how that paper was reproduced
- detailed documentation of the drugome method
- a publication that reports on that work.
