Difference between revisions of "Document the provenance of the results"
From Geoscience Paper of the Future
(Set PropertyValue: StartDate = 2015-03-13) |
(Set PropertyValue: TargetDate = 2015-04-04) |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 62: | Line 62: | ||
Owner=Yolanda_Gil| | Owner=Yolanda_Gil| | ||
Progress=40| | Progress=40| | ||
− | StartDate=2015-03- | + | StartDate=2015-03-07| |
− | TargetDate=2015- | + | TargetDate=2015-04-04| |
Type=Low}} | Type=Low}} |
Latest revision as of 05:28, 17 April 2015
Contents
What This Task Involves
The training session and training materials indicate how to:
- Capture the provenance of the results in a paper
- Develop a workflow sketch, a formal workflow, or a provenance record that represent to different degrees of accuracy what the provenance of the results is
- Publish the provenance and make it part of a publication
Training Materials
This training session was held on March 6, 2015:
Suggested Readings
- “Requirements for Provenance on the Web.” Paul Groth, Yolanda Gil, James Cheney, Simon Miles. International Journal of Digital Curation, 7(1), 2012.
- A general overview of provenance'
- "A Primer for the PROV Provenance Model." Yolanda Gil, Simon Miles, Khalid Belhajjame, Helena Deus, Daniel Garijo, Graham Klyne, Paolo Missier, Stian Soiland-Reyes, and Stephan Zednik. Published as a W3C Working Group Note on 30 April 2013.
- A brief and practical introduction to the PROV standard for provenance, showing examples of how to represent the provenance record in RDF through a simple notation called Turtle
- "Intelligent Workflow Systems and Provenance-Aware Software." Gil, Y. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Congress on Environmental Modeling and Software, San Diego, CA, 2014.
- A brief introduction to workflows for scientists, giving examples and explanations of their benefits
What To Do
We described many options in the training. Here is a sketch of the most common approach:
- At the very minimum, describe the workflow in the text (a "Methods" section) or in an appendix
- Mention the datasets used, the software, and the data flow across the software components
- Specify unique identifiers for data and software, mention the version used, credit all the sources
- Develop a workflow sketch and show it in a figure or in an appendix
- Capture high-level dataflow across components
- To really capture the full provenance, specify the formal workflow or provenance record
- The formal workflow shows all data flow across components, corresponding to the detailed command line invocations and parameter values used
- Options:
- Describe it as a graph where the nodes are computations and the links show data and parameters
- Use the PROV provenance standard (start with a result and trace back how it was generated)
- Use a workflow system (e.g. WINGS) to create the data flow graph
- Publish the formal workflow or provenance record, and assign a unique identifier
- Cite it in the paper
- Show the provenance graph
Using the WINGS Workflow System to Document Provenance
Documentation on how to use the WINGS workflow system:
- A tutorial
- Introductory papers
- A portal where you can get an account and try it out
- Downloading the code to set up in a local machine
Some examples of workflows created with WINGS for GPF papers: