Difference between revisions of "Write about making data accessible"
From Geoscience Paper of the Future
(Set PropertyValue: Owner = Allen Pope) |
|||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- Do NOT Edit below this Line --> | <!-- Do NOT Edit below this Line --> | ||
{{#set: | {{#set: | ||
| − | Owner= | + | Owner=Allen_Pope| |
| − | + | Participants=Mimi_Tzeng| | |
SubTask=Write_about_using_data_from_public_repositories| | SubTask=Write_about_using_data_from_public_repositories| | ||
SubTask=Write_about_using_data_from_colleagues| | SubTask=Write_about_using_data_from_colleagues| | ||
SubTask=Write_about_data_preparation| | SubTask=Write_about_data_preparation| | ||
| + | SubTask=Write_about_large_datasets| | ||
Type=Medium}} | Type=Medium}} | ||
'''Comments and General Discussion, Observations in the Group:''' | '''Comments and General Discussion, Observations in the Group:''' | ||
Latest revision as of 21:14, 13 March 2015
Comments and General Discussion, Observations in the Group:
Data notation and DOIs Conversation at F2F meeting: In the conversation during the face-to-face meeting we looked at examples of each author's wiki posts. Ibrahim had posted data for his article and included the QR code with the entry. We discussed whether or not a QR code was appropriate to include in the actual journal articles to improve accessibility. The group determined that a hyperlink to the DOIs is an easy and accessible way to access data in the papers, whereas a QR code is more useful in the context of presentations (e.g. technical posters). So, the group felt that including the datalink via DOIs is a the best practice in journal articles
