Difference between revisions of "Document domain characteristics by Allen Pope"
From Geoscience Paper of the Future
(Set PropertyValue: Owner = Allen Pope) |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[Category:Task]] | [[Category:Task]] | ||
<br/><b>Details on how to do this task:</b> [[Document domain characteristics]]<br/><br/> | <br/><b>Details on how to do this task:</b> [[Document domain characteristics]]<br/><br/> | ||
| + | With CSDMS: the things that I am measuring are at an odd interface between the surface of glaciers and the lakes themselves (which is distinct of “meltwater” because meltwater can be in both lakes and streams, and I’m only talking about the lakes). So, although the CSDMS structures make sense, there is still some discretion and parsing which is necessary and I’m not 100% certain about it. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Also, a fuller mapping of variables could definitely done (as opposed to specific inputs and outputs), but because it isn’t passing models right now (it is an algorithm applies to satellite imagery), it is something to keep in mind but not strictly necessary | ||
<!-- Add any wiki Text above this Line --> | <!-- Add any wiki Text above this Line --> | ||
<!-- Do NOT Edit below this Line --> | <!-- Do NOT Edit below this Line --> | ||
{{#set: | {{#set: | ||
| + | Expertise=Open_science| | ||
| + | Expertise=Geosciences| | ||
Owner=Allen_Pope| | Owner=Allen_Pope| | ||
| − | Progress= | + | Progress=75| |
StartDate=2015-04-18| | StartDate=2015-04-18| | ||
TargetDate=2015-05-01| | TargetDate=2015-05-01| | ||
Type=Low}} | Type=Low}} | ||
Latest revision as of 04:08, 18 June 2015
Details on how to do this task: Document domain characteristics
With CSDMS: the things that I am measuring are at an odd interface between the surface of glaciers and the lakes themselves (which is distinct of “meltwater” because meltwater can be in both lakes and streams, and I’m only talking about the lakes). So, although the CSDMS structures make sense, there is still some discretion and parsing which is necessary and I’m not 100% certain about it.
Also, a fuller mapping of variables could definitely done (as opposed to specific inputs and outputs), but because it isn’t passing models right now (it is an algorithm applies to satellite imagery), it is something to keep in mind but not strictly necessary
