Difference between revisions of "Harmonize lake and catchment datasets"
From Age of Water
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
*** Scale: daily, taking the mean, flow as m3/s | *** Scale: daily, taking the mean, flow as m3/s | ||
*** We will have it all in a single file, which can be postprocessed to break it down into separate files | *** We will have it all in a single file, which can be postprocessed to break it down into separate files | ||
| − | **** Structure of the file: the columns will be: time, then surface flow for each of the 4 inflow rivers, then overland flow, then groundwater inflow, then groundwater outflow, outlet flow | + | **** Structure of the file: the columns will be: time, then surface flow for each of the 4 inflow rivers, then overland flow, then groundwater inflow (typically positive), then groundwater outflow (typically negative), outlet flow |
| + | **** In and outflow should balance, except for precipitation and evaporation (though PIHM can provide evaporation) | ||
<!-- Add any wiki Text above this Line --> | <!-- Add any wiki Text above this Line --> | ||
Revision as of 21:31, 2 February 2017
- Test case: Mendota
- PIHM output for GLM:
- Inflow rivers to consider:
- Yahara
- Pheasant Branch
- Six Mile
- Spring Harbour (a very small one)
- For each inflow, PIHM will output: surface flow (ie streamflow), subsurface flow, and groundwater as 3 files
- Scale: daily, taking the mean, flow as m3/s
- We will have it all in a single file, which can be postprocessed to break it down into separate files
- Structure of the file: the columns will be: time, then surface flow for each of the 4 inflow rivers, then overland flow, then groundwater inflow (typically positive), then groundwater outflow (typically negative), outlet flow
- In and outflow should balance, except for precipitation and evaporation (though PIHM can provide evaporation)
- Inflow rivers to consider:
- PIHM output for GLM:
