Difference between revisions of "Harmonize lake and catchment datasets"
From Age of Water
(Added PropertyValue: Participants = Paul Hanson) |
|||
| (5 intermediate revisions by one user not shown) | |||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
Expertise=Hydrology| | Expertise=Hydrology| | ||
Expertise=Ecosystem_modeling| | Expertise=Ecosystem_modeling| | ||
| − | Owner=Paul_Hanson| | + | Owner=Hilary_Dugan| |
| + | Participants=Paul_Hanson| | ||
Participants=Chris_Duffy| | Participants=Chris_Duffy| | ||
| − | |||
Participants=Yu_Zhang| | Participants=Yu_Zhang| | ||
| − | Progress= | + | Progress=30| |
StartDate=2017-01-31| | StartDate=2017-01-31| | ||
TargetDate=2017-03-30| | TargetDate=2017-03-30| | ||
Type=Low}} | Type=Low}} | ||
Latest revision as of 22:03, 2 February 2017
- Test case: Mendota
- PIHM output for GLM:
- Inflow rivers to consider:
- Yahara
- Pheasant Branch
- Six Mile
- Spring Harbour (a very small one)
- For each inflow, PIHM will output: surface flow (ie streamflow), subsurface flow, and groundwater as 3 files
- Scale: daily, taking the mean, flow as m3/s
- PIHM will generate this data in a single file, which can be postprocessed to break it down into separate files
- Structure of the file: the columns will be: time, then surface flow for each of the 4 inflow rivers, then overland flow, then groundwater inflow (typically positive), then groundwater outflow (typically negative), outlet flow (Q)
- Total inflow and outflow should balance, except for precipitation and evaporation (though PIHM can provide them) which GLM provides
- Inflow rivers to consider:
- PIHM output for GLM:
