Select catchment model - Revision history

Chris at 11:16, 27 August 2014

2014-08-27T11:16:04Z

Chris at 11:08, 27 August 2014

2014-08-27T11:08:52Z

Chris at 11:07, 27 August 2014

2014-08-27T11:07:02Z

206.117.31.126: Set PropertyValue: Progress = 100

2014-08-26T16:08:13Z

Set PropertyValue: Progress = 100

206.117.31.126: Set PropertyValue: Type = low

2014-08-26T16:08:06Z

Set PropertyValue: Type = low

Chris: Set PropertyValue: TargetDate = 2014-02-28

2014-08-26T11:36:12Z

Set PropertyValue: TargetDate = 2014-02-28

Chris: Set PropertyValue: StartDate = 2014-01-28

2014-08-26T11:27:34Z

Set PropertyValue: StartDate = 2014-01-28

Chris at 11:25, 26 August 2014

2014-08-26T11:25:46Z

Chris: Added PropertyValue: Participants = Xuan Yu

2014-08-26T11:23:03Z

Added PropertyValue: Participants = Xuan Yu

Chris: Added PropertyValue: Participants = Gopal Bhatt

2014-08-26T11:22:56Z

Added PropertyValue: Participants = Gopal Bhatt

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 [[Category:Task]]
-We decided to use [[Document_the_PIHM_catchment_model | PIHM]] as the basic model but will incorporate a new strategy to embed lake hydrography in pihm.In the 2nd half of 2014 we will test a new version of pihm that explicitly allows 2-D surface-water bodies.  The criteria we used to decide on the modeling framework was our need to be able to couple the lake hydrodynamic model code with the catchment code efficiently. Although pihm is quite flexible for integrating new physics modules there still are important criteria such as the ability to use a common solver and and the amount of work for harmonizing the input/output data and formats for visual-analytics.  In the future we intend to evaluate other catchment-lake physics codes but GLM-PIHM makes the best choice for the prototype given the science we wish to achieve.
+This task started in January 2014 and was completed Feb 2014. The goal was to choose a strategy for catchment-lake coupling that would serve as an initial prototype and that could evolve efficiently in the future (e.g. more advanced lake and catchment processes (stable isotopes, transport processes, ecosystem variables).  We decided to use [[Document_the_PIHM_catchment_model | PIHM]] as the basic model and will incorporate a new strategy to embed lake hydrography in pihm.In the 2nd half of 2014 we will test a new version of pihm that explicitly allows 2-D surface-water bodies in a reasonable time (~6 months).  The criteria we used to decide on the modeling framework was our need to be able to couple the lake hydrodynamic model code with the catchment code efficiently. Although pihm is quite flexible for integrating new physics modules there still are important criteria such as the ability to use a common solver and and the amount of work necessary for harmonizing the input/output data and formats for visual-analytics.  In the future we intend to evaluate other catchment-lake physics codes but GLM-PIHM makes the best choice for the prototype given the science we wish to achieve.
 : <span style="color:#5F9EA0"> @ChrisDuffy: We should have some text in this page justifying the choice.  Also, we should have begin and end dates, and show that the task has ended and is 100% completed. -- -- [[Yolanda_Gil | Yolanda]] </span>

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 [[Category:Task]]
-We decided to use [[Document_the_PIHM_catchment_model | PIHM]] as the basic model but will incorporate a new strategy to embed lake hydrography in pihm.In the 2nd half of 2014 we will test a new version of pihm that explicitly allows 2-D surface-water bodies.  The criteria we used to decide on the modeling framework was our need to be able to couple the lake hydrodynamic model code with the catchment code efficiently. Although pihm is quite flexible for integrating new physics modules there still are important criteria such as the ability to use a common solver and and the amount of work for harmonizing the input/output data and formats for visual-analytics.
+We decided to use [[Document_the_PIHM_catchment_model | PIHM]] as the basic model but will incorporate a new strategy to embed lake hydrography in pihm.In the 2nd half of 2014 we will test a new version of pihm that explicitly allows 2-D surface-water bodies.  The criteria we used to decide on the modeling framework was our need to be able to couple the lake hydrodynamic model code with the catchment code efficiently. Although pihm is quite flexible for integrating new physics modules there still are important criteria such as the ability to use a common solver and and the amount of work for harmonizing the input/output data and formats for visual-analytics.  In the future we intend to evaluate other catchment-lake physics codes but GLM-PIHM makes the best choice for the prototype given the science we wish to achieve.
 : <span style="color:#5F9EA0"> @ChrisDuffy: We should have some text in this page justifying the choice.  Also, we should have begin and end dates, and show that the task has ended and is 100% completed. -- -- [[Yolanda_Gil | Yolanda]] </span>

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 [[Category:Task]]
-We decided to use [[Document_the_PIHM_catchment_model | PIHM]] as the basic model but will incorporate a new strategy to embed lake hydrography in pihm.In the 2nd half of 2014 we will test a new version of pihm that explicitly allows 2-D surface-water bodies.
+We decided to use [[Document_the_PIHM_catchment_model | PIHM]] as the basic model but will incorporate a new strategy to embed lake hydrography in pihm.In the 2nd half of 2014 we will test a new version of pihm that explicitly allows 2-D surface-water bodies.  The criteria we used to decide on the modeling framework was our need to be able to couple the lake hydrodynamic model code with the catchment code efficiently. Although pihm is quite flexible for integrating new physics modules there still are important criteria such as the ability to use a common solver and and the amount of work for harmonizing the input/output data and formats for visual-analytics.
 : <span style="color:#5F9EA0"> @ChrisDuffy: We should have some text in this page justifying the choice.  Also, we should have begin and end dates, and show that the task has ended and is 100% completed. -- -- [[Yolanda_Gil | Yolanda]] </span>

@@ Line 12: / Line 12: @@
 	Participants=Gopal_Bhatt|
 	Participants=Xuan_Yu|
 	StartDate=2014-01-28|
 	TargetDate=2014-02-28|
 	Type=Low}}

@@ Line 14: / Line 14: @@
 	StartDate=2014-01-28|
 	TargetDate=2014-02-28|
-	Type=Medium}}
+	Type=Low}}

@@ Line 10: / Line 10: @@
 {{#set:
 	Owner=Chris_Duffy|
 	Participants=Gopal_Bhatt|
-	StartDate=2014-02-28|
+	Participants=Xuan_Yu|
 	TargetDate=2014-03-28|
 	Type=Medium}}